Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance, 248 S.C. 504 (S.C. 1966)
151 S.E.2d 640; 1966 S.C. LEXIS 216

Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, immaterial, and redundant.

The general rule is well settled that an order refusing to strike allegations in a pleading as irrelevant and redundant is not conclusive upon the trial of the case on the merits and is not appealable. Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc., 230 S. C. 507, 96 S. E. (2d) 488; Winchester v. United Insurance Co., 231 S. C. 288, 98 S. E. (2d) 530; Blackmon v. United Insurance Co., 233 S. C. 424, 105 S. E. (2d) 521; Tate v. Oxner, 236 S. C. 313, 114 S. E. (2d) 225; Mason v. Kresge, 247 S. C. 144, 146 S. E. (2d) 158. Application of the foregoing rule to the present appeal requires that it be dismissed; and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Margaret REGISTER v. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and James W. Cannon Insurance Agency, of whom Niagara Fire Insurance Company is
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published