Smith v. State
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
The petitioners, Willie J. Smith and James Weldon Smith, sought habeas corpus relief from sentences imposed
The apparent impact of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jackson on the validity of confinements under guilty pleas which, under applicable statutes, had the effect of insulating the accused from the possibility of the death penalty, has been mitigated by subsequent decisions of that Court. There is no legal presumption that such a plea was coerced. Instead, the question in each case of claimed coercion is whether, under all the facts and circumstances, the guilty plea was voluntarily and understandingly entered. Sweet v. State, S. C., 178 S. E. (2d) 657, filed January 12, 1971, and authorities therein cited. It follows that the court erred in resolving this issue in petitioners’ favor as one of law.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Willie J. SMITH and James Weldon Smith v. STATE of South Carolina
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published