Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1973

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Jones

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Jones
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided December 4, 1973 · Per Curiam
201 S.E.2d 244; 261 S.C. 515; 1973 S.C. LEXIS 282 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Greenwich Savings Bank v. Jones

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is an action by plaintiff bank to foreclose a mortgage on real .estate. The respondent Mary E. Jones and Leon Jones, now deceased, were the mortgagors. The appellant United American Life Insurance Company was made a party because of the issuance by it of a credit life insurance policy upon the life of the said Leon Jones, which policy United contends was duly cancelled by it prior to the death of Leon Jones.

Appellant United appeals from an order of the lower court denying its motion for summary judgment made pursuant to Circuit Court Rule 44. This Court having adopted the general rule that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory decision which is not directly appealable, Geiger v. Carolina Pool Equipment Distributors, Inc., 257 S. C. 112, 184 S. E. (2d) 446, the appellant has petitioned for leave to argue against said decision and has urged this Court to either overrule or modify the same.

We have carefully considered the briefs and argument of the appellant and are not presently convinced that we should *517 either modify or overrule said decision. The appeal is, accordingly,

Dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.