*556 Appellants, Queen’s Grant Villas Horizontal Property Regimes I-V (the Regimes), brought these actions against respondents for alleged defects in the construction of the common elements of a condominum project. The lower court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment, finding the Regimes lacked standing to maintain the actions. We reverse.

A property regime has standing to bring an action for construction defects in common elements that the regime has the duty to maintain. Roundtree Villas Ass’n v. 4701 Kings Corp., 282 S. C. 415, 321 S. E. (2d) 46 (1984). In this case, the master deeds and the by-laws incorporated therein show that the Regime has the obligation to maintain the common elements. Should the Regime not uphold its duty to pursue a recovery for any alleged construction defects, in the common elements which it maintains, it may be liable to the homeowners for its omissions.

The effect of our opinion is to overrule the Court of Appeals’ decision in Dockside Ass’n v. Detyens, __ S. C. __, 330 S. E. (2d) 537 (S. C. App. 1985), which erroneously stated that a regime has no standing to maintain an action unless it owns the common elements.

Reversed and remanded.