Appellant contends that the circuit court erred in failing to afford him a jury trial, a trial de novo, or the opportunity to introduce further evidence in his appeal from the probate court.

This Court adopts the opinion issued by the Court of Appeals in Martin v. Skinner, 286 S. C. 527, 335 S. E. (2d) 252 (Ct. App. 1985) in toto. That case is dis-positive of the issues raised on this appeal.

Affirmed.