Johnson v. State
Cases that cite this one
77 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Pinckney v. Ozmint (District Court, D. South Carolina 2007)
- Pettinato v. Eagleton (District Court, D. South Carolina 2006)
- Bustos v. White (4th Cir. 2008)
- Primus v. Padula (District Court, D. South Carolina 2008)
- In re the Care & Treatment of McCoy (S.C. 2004)
- Payne v. State (S.C. 2003)
- Norris v. South Carolina (4th Cir. 2002)
- Joseph v. State (S.C. 2002)
- Jamison v. Cohen (District Court, D. South Carolina 2016)
- Ellison v. State (S.C. 2009)
- Richardson v. State (S.C. 2008)
- McLeod v. State (S.C. 2005)
- Dunbar Jr. v. Stonebreaker (District Court, D. South Carolina 2025)
- Lancaster v. Warden Perry Correctional Institution (District Court, D. South Carolina 2022)
- McGee v. Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution (District Court, D. South Carolina 2022)
- Heard v. Stephan (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Pegues v. Kendall (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)
- Heath v. Williams (District Court, D. South Carolina 2020)
- Glover v. State (S.C. 2017)
- Hughes v. State (S.C. Ct. App. 2016)
- Beatty v. Rawski (District Court, D. South Carolina 2015)
- Dorsey v. State (S.C. Ct. App. 2015)
- Jamison v. State (S.C. 2014)
- Sease v. State (S.C. 2013)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
This Court has approved the withdrawal of counsel in meritless post-conviction appeals, provided the procedures outlined in Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. (2d) 493 (1967), were followed.
Although the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Pennsylvania v. Finley,_U. S--, 107 S. Ct. 1990, 95 L. Ed. (2d) 539 (1987), holds that the Anders procedure is not required in such cases, we adhere to our prior procedure.
After review of the entire record in this case and after careful consideration of petitioner’s pro se document, counsel’s request to withdraw is granted and the matter dismissed.
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.