In re Peagler
In re Peagler
Opinion of the Court
This is a judicial disciplinary matter. In March 1990, during his term as Probate Judge for Berkeley County, respondent became a candidate in the Democratic primary election for the office of county supervisor. In November 1990, he was the Democratic candidate in the general election for that office.
Canon 7(A)(3) of the Code of Judicial Conduct
A judge should resign his office when he becomes a candidate either in a party primary or in a general election for a non-judicial office----
As noted in the commentary to this cannon, its purpose is “to protect the integrity of the judicial system by preventing even the appearance that a judge’s decision might be politically motivated.”
It is undisputed respondent blatantly violated Canon 7(A)(3). Respondent contends, however, the canon is unenforceable because it was not precleared by the United States Attorney General before its adoption as required under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Because respondent violated Canon 7(A)(3), he is hereby publicly reprimanded.
Public reprimand.
Formerly Supreme Court Rule 33; now Rule 501, SCACR.
42 U.S.C. § 1973c.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.