Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996

Harrington v. Blackston

Harrington v. Blackston
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided June 6, 1996 · Burnett, Finney, Moore, Toal, Waller
322 S.C. 470; 473 S.E.2d 47; 1996 S.C. LEXIS 225

Harrington v. Blackston

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in this Court. Prior to the Court acting on the petition, the parties submitted a consent order of settlement and a settlement agreement to the Court for its approval. The consent order of settlement and settlement agreement are hereby approved and the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Harrington v. Blackston, — S.C. —, 459 S.E. (2d) 309 (Ct. App. 1995) is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED. _

/s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr.. C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal. J. /s/ James E. Moore. J. Is/ John H. Waller. Jr.. J. Burnett, Justice:

While I agree that the consent order of settlement and settlement agreement should be approved, I disagree with the majority’s decision to vacate the Court of Appeals’ opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑