State v. Gill

Supreme Court of South Carolina
State v. Gill, 489 S.E.2d 478 (S.C. 1997)
327 S.C. 253; 1997 S.C. LEXIS 158
Per Curiam

State v. Gill

Opinion

*254 PER CURIAM:

We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision denying petitioner relief, by a vote of two-to-one, on his Batson 1 claim. State v. Gill, 319 S.C. 283, 460 S.E.2d 412 (Ct.App. 1995). We find the Court of Appeals erred in reaching the Batson “mixed motive” issue because it was not properly preserved for appeal, never having been raised to or ruled upon by the trial judge, see, e.g., Smith v. Phillips, 318 S.C. 453, 458 S.E.2d 427 (1995).

Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the Court of Appeals, and affirm petitioner’s conviction.

1

. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).

Reference

Full Case Name
The STATE, Respondent, v. Michael Jerrod GILL, Petitioner
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published