Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1997

In re Nelson

In re Nelson
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided June 6, 1997 · Finney, III, John, Moore, Toal, Waller
326 S.C. 262; 486 S.E.2d 97; 1997 S.C. LEXIS 113

In re Nelson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Respondent has filed a petition for reinstatement, motion to dismiss, motion to quash and motion for ancillary relief. Disciplinary Counsel has filed returns in opposition to these motions and has requested that respondent be placed on interim suspension. We deny each of respondent’s motions and all other relief he has requested. We grant Disciplinary Counsel’s request to place respondent on interim suspension based on the fact that respondent has been indicted for a serious offense. Rules 2(z), 16 and 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, J. /s/ James E. Moore, J. /s/ John H, Waller Jr., J. /s/ E.C. Burnett III, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.