Thompson v. State
Thompson v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Milton Thompson, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Spartanburg County
J. Derham Cole, Trial Judge
Wyatt T. Saunders, Jr., Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2007-MO-008
Submitted January 17, 2007 Filed February 12, 2007
DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda H. Carter, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Molly R. Crum, all of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR).
Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judges finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).
Petitioners appeal is dismissed, after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsels motion to be relieved is granted.
DISMISSED.TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.