Curtis v. Blake
Curtis v. Blake
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
William D. Curtis, Respondent,
v.
Sandra Morris Blake, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Brandon T. Blake, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2011-191906
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Orangeburg County J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-043 Heard October 16, 2012 – Filed October 24, 2012
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Thomas J. Keaveny, II and Amy B. Rothschild, both of Keaveny Law Firm, of Charleston, for Petitioner.
Robert Norris Hill, of Newberry, Mark Brandon Tinsley, of Gooding & Gooding, of Allendale, and C. Bradley Hutto, of Williams & Williams, of Orangeburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals affirming the denial of Petitioner's motion for a new trial. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished