Martinez v. State
Martinez v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Eduardo Martinez, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2009-148626
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2013-MO-007 Submitted January 7, 2013 – Filed February 27, 2013
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Kathrine Haggard Hudgins of Columbia for Petitioner.
Ashleigh Rayanna Wilson of Columbia for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the Appendix and briefs, the writ of certiorari is DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.