THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Mason Johnson, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213721

Appeal From York County The Honorable Lee S. Alford, Trial Judge The Honorable John C. Hayes, III, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-033 Submitted August 6, 2014 – Filed August 13, 2014

AFFIRMED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner,

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Assistant Attorney General J. Rutledge Johnson, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR).

We deny the petition as to petitioner's Question II. However, because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari on petitioner's Question I and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986).

Petitioner's convictions and sentences are affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Sinclair, 275 S.C. 608, 274 S.E.2d 411 (1981) (where appellant's objection was sustained and he sought no further relief, this Court has no issue to decide); State v. Beck, 342 S.C. 129, 536 S.E.2d 679 (2000); State v. Jennings, 394 S.C. 473, 716 S.E.2d 91 (2011).

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.