Mulligan v. State
Mulligan v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Bryan L. Mulligan, Respondent,
v.
State of South Carolina, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2013-002130
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Dorchester County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-024 Submitted April 1, 2015 – Filed April 29, 2015
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Megan E. Harrigan, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Tara Dawn Shurling, of Law Office of Tara Dawn Shurling, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of Respondent's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished