Mulligan v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Mulligan v. State

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Bryan L. Mulligan, Respondent,

v.

State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2013-002130

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Dorchester County Carmen T. Mullen, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-024 Submitted April 1, 2015 – Filed April 29, 2015

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Megan E. Harrigan, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Tara Dawn Shurling, of Law Office of Tara Dawn Shurling, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the grant of Respondent's application for post-conviction relief (PCR). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Unpublished