Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2015

Beckman v. Sysco

Beckman v. Sysco
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 18, 2015

Beckman v. Sysco

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Neal Beckman, Employee, Respondent, v. Sysco Columbia, LLC, Employer, and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Carrier, Petitioners.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001691

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from the Appellate Panel South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission

Opinion No. 27590 Heard November 3, 2015 – Filed November 18, 2015

DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Kathryn Fiehrer Walton, of Wood Law Group, L.L.C., of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Frederick W. Riesen, Jr., of Riesen Law Firm, L.L.P., of N. Charleston, and Stephen Benjamin Samuels, of Samuels Law Firm, L.L.C., of Columbia, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted the petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' decision in Beckman v. Sysco Columbia, L.L.C., 408 S.C. 501, 759 S.E.2d 750 (Ct. App. 2014). We first direct the Court of Appeals to depublish its opinion and assign the matter an unpublished opinion number. The above opinion shall no longer have any precedential effect. Next, we dismiss as improvidently granted the writ of certiorari.

Accordingly, we DEPUBLISH THE OPINION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS AND DISMISS CERTIORARI AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.