Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Travaughn Thomas, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2014-001870
Appeal From Greenville County Robin B. Stilwell, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2016-MO-025 Submitted June 16, 2016 – Filed July 20, 2016
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Susan B. Hackett, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Karen C.
Ratigan, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the post- conviction relief judge. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.