Roe v. Bibby

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Roe v. Bibby

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Supreme Court Jane Roe, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, Minor Children Under the Age of Eighteen, (18), Petitioners, v. Daniel Bibby Sr. and Michelle Bibby, Defendants, of Whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2014-002500 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Berkeley County

R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27652

Heard November 5, 2015 – Filed August 10, 2016

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED Eric M. Poulin, of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners. Eugene P. Corrigan, III and J.W. Nelson Chandler, both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Roe v. Bibby, 410 S.C. 287, 763 S.E.2d 645 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Published