Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2016

Roe v. Bibby

Roe v. Bibby
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided August 10, 2016

Roe v. Bibby

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Jane Roe, as parent and natural guardian of Judy Roe, James Roe, and Joyce Roe, Minor Children Under the Age of Eighteen, (18), Petitioners,

v. Daniel Bibby Sr. and Michelle Bibby, Defendants, of Whom Michelle Bibby is the Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002500

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Berkeley County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27652 Heard November 5, 2015 – Filed August 10, 2016

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Eric M. Poulin, of Anastopoulo Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners.

Eugene P. Corrigan, III and J.W. Nelson Chandler, both of Corrigan & Chandler, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Roe v. Bibby, 410 S.C. 287, 763 S.E.2d 645 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN, JJ., and Acting Justice Jean H. Toal, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.