Temple v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Temple v. State

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Dan L. Temple, Petitioner,

v.

State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2016-001756

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal from Oconee County Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2018-MO-037 Submitted November 15, 2018 – Filed December 5, 2018

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Lindsey A. McCallister, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of Petitioner Dan Temple's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.

Reference

Status
Unpublished