State v. Hernandez
State v. Hernandez
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Mario Valerio Gonzalez Hernandez, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2017-002206
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Newberry County Eugene C. Griffith Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2019-MO-017 Heard March 26, 2019 – Filed April 3, 2019
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Graham R. Billings, of Charlotte, North Carolina, and Blake T. Williams, Of Columbia, both of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, all for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor David Matthew Stumbo, of Greenwood, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Hernandez, Op. No. 2017-UP-324 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Aug. 2, 2017). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.