Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Eugene Thomas, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002304
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal from Greenville County John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2019-MO-031 Heard June 11, 2019 – Filed June 19, 2019
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter and Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Benjamin Hunter Limbaugh, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of Petitioner Eugene Thomas's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.