Berry v. State
Berry v. State
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Kristopher Wilmont Berry, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2017-000100
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Appeal From Darlington County Roger E. Henderson, Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 2019-MO-037 Submitted September 16, 2019 – Filed October 2, 2019
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Megan Harrigan Jameson, and Assistant Attorney General Johnny Ellis James, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the PCR court's decision dismissing Petitioner's Application for Relief. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished