State v. Odom
State v. Odom
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Maurice Anthony Odom, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2018-001676
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Edgefield County R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2020-MO-001 Heard December 11, 2019 – Filed January 22, 2020
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard III, of Lexington, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Odom, Op. No. 2018-UP-273 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 27, 2018).
We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.