Mahoney v. The Muhler Company, Inc.
Mahoney v. The Muhler Company, Inc.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court J. Daniel Mahoney, Respondent, v. The Muhler Company, Inc. and Henry Hay III, in his individual capacity, Petitioners.
Appellate Case No. 2020-000370
Appeal from Charleston County Bentley Price, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2021-MO-004 Heard April 13, 2021 – Filed April 21, 2021
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Andrew K. Epting Jr. and Jaan G. Rannik, both of Epting & Rannik, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners.
Clayton B. McCullough, of McCullough Khan, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' order dated October 25, 2019, granting Respondent's motion to dismiss Petitioners' appeal. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.