State v. Sidney Moorer
State v. Sidney Moorer
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Sidney Moorer, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001434
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Horry County R. Markley Dennis, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 2022-MO-006 Heard May 17, 2022 – Filed May 25, 2022
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, and Solicitor Jimmy Richardson II, of Conway, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to review whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the circuit court's denial of Petitioner's motion for directed verdict on the charge of obstruction of justice. State v. Sidney Moorer, Op. No. 2020-UP-198 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 1, 2020). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.