Daisy Frederick v. Daniel McDowell
Daisy Frederick v. Daniel McDowell
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Daisy Frederick, Respondent, v. Daniel Lee McDowell, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001480
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Marlboro County Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2024-MO-012 Heard May 2, 2024 – Filed May 22, 2024
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
R. Hawthorne Barrett, of Turner Padget Graham & Laney, PA, of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Robert Brian Critzer, of Wyche, PA, of Columbia; Kaye Gorenflo Hearn, of Wyche, PA, of Conway; and Eric Marc Poulin and Roy T. Willey, IV, both of Poulin, Willey, Anastopoulo, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Frederick v. McDowell, Op. No. 2022-UP-303 (S.C. Ct. App. filed July 20, 2022). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.