Steven M. Bernard v. 3 Chisolm Street
Steven M. Bernard v. 3 Chisolm Street
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Steven M. Bernard and Deborah J. Bernard, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Petitioners, v. Chisolm Street Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondent.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001202
Appeal from Charleston County Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2024-MO-016 Heard June 18, 2024 – Filed July 3, 2024
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
O. Grady Query and Michael W. Sautter, both of Query Sautter & Associates, LLC, of Charleston, for Petitioners.
M. Dawes Cooke, Jr., of Barnwell Whaley Patterson & Helms, LLC, of Charleston and Andrew F. Lindemann, of Lindemann Law Firm, P.A., of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Bernard v. 3 Chisolm Street Homeowners Assoc., Inc., 2022-UP-269 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 22, 2022). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
KITTREDGE, Acting Chief Justice, FEW, JAMES, HILL, JJ., and Acting Justice Letitia H. Verdin, concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.