Saundra Hoffman v. State Farm
Saundra Hoffman v. State Farm
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Saundra R. Hoffman, Petitioner-Respondent, v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Respondent- Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001004
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal From Lexington County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2024-MO-025 Submitted October 16, 2024 – Filed November 6, 2024
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Pamela R. Mullis, of Mullis Law Firm, PA, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Robert William Whelan, of Whelan Mellen & Norris, LLC, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Petitioner-Respondent (Hoffman) and Respondent-Petitioner (State Farm) both seek writs of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in Hoffman v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., Op. No. 2024-UP-067 (S.C. Ct. App. refiled May 15, 2024). We deny Hoffman's petition for a writ of certiorari, grant State Farm's petition for a writ of certiorari, dispense with briefing, and affirm the court of appeals' decision as modified.
In its opinion, the court of appeals held the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment on Hoffman's cause of action for breach of contract. The court properly held there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether State Farm was equitably estopped from raising the defense of the statute of limitations.
However, on the previous page, the court found "State Farm is precluded from asserting the defense of the statute of limitations" for the breach of contract claim. (Emphasis added). This is an incorrect statement as the court held there was a genuine issue of material fact on the issue. Therefore, we modify the court of appeals opinion to clarify that, while State Farm is not entitled to summary judgment on the statute of limitations, State Farm is not precluded from asserting a statute of limitations defense.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
KITTREDGE, C.J., FEW, JAMES and HILL, JJ., concur. VERDIN, J., not participating.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.