Serrano-Vargas v. United States
Serrano-Vargas v. United States
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
EVARISTO SERRANO-VARGAS, 4:18-CV-04084-KES
Movant, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT vs. AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Movant, Evaristo Serrano-Vargas, filed this lawsuit as a pro se petition for a writ of coram nobis. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for the purpose of conducting any necessary hearings, including evidentiary hearings. The United States moved to dismiss the action for failure to state a claim. Docket 10. On December 7, 2018, the magistrate judge submitted her report and recommended that the motion to dismiss of the United States (Docket 10) be granted and that Serrano-Vargas’s petition for a writ of coram nobis (Docket 1) be dismissed with prejudice Serrano-Vargas was notified in the report and recommendation that he had 14 days to file objections to the report. Even though no objections were filed that would require de novo review under Thompson v. Nix,
897 F.2d 356(8th Cir. 1990), the court reviewed the matter de novo and finds that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted in full. Therefore, it is ORDERED that:
1. The report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Docket 13) is adopted in full. 2. The government’s motion to dismiss (Docket 10) is granted. 3. Serrano-Vargas’s complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Dated December 27, 2018. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen E. Schreier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown