District Court, D. South Dakota, 2020

Kieffe v. United States

Kieffe v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota · Decided January 28, 2020
Kieffe v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION CHARLES KIEFFE, 5:19-CV-05067-JLV Plaintiff, Ws. ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

This matter is before the court pursuant to petitioner Charles Kieffe’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3006(a)(1)} and (c}, and United States District Judge Jeffrey L. Viken’s Standing Order dated October 31, 2019, the Federal Public Defender for the Districts of South _ Dakota and North Dakota was appointed to represent all financially eligible defendants in criminal cases in this district who may be eligible to seek a reduced or modified sentence based upon the decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019) and subsequent Court decisions.

Mr. Kieffe’s § 2255 habeas petition seeks to reduce or modify his sentence pursuant to United States v. Davis. This Court entered an Order granting the Federal Public Defender for the District of South Dakota’s motion to withdraw from Mr. Kieffe’s case due to a continuing conflict of interest. (Doc. 13). Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Ellery Grey is hereby appointed to represent the petitioner in the above entitled case.

DATED this IE say of January, 2020.

BY THE COURT: DANETA WOLLMANN United States Magistrate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.