Childers v. Unknown P.D. Officer SFPD 1

District Court, D. South Dakota

Childers v. Unknown P.D. Officer SFPD 1

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

PRIEOR CHILDERS, 4:22-CV-04001-KES

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S vs. MOTION TO APPEAL WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES UNKNOWN P.D. OFFICER SFPD #1, in his individual and official capacity; MICHAEL MATTSON, Warden, in his individual and official capacity; UNKNOWN P.D. OFFICER SFPD #2, in his individual and official capacity; ROBERTS, Medical, in his or her official capacity; HSA LUTHER, Medical, in his or her official capacity; ALBERS, Sgt., in his or her official capacity,

Defendants.

Plaintiff, Prieor Childers, an inmate at the Minnehaha County Jail, filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. Docket 1. Judgment was entered against Childers, and he filed a notice of appeal. Dockets 24, 25. Now, Childers moves to appeal without prepayment of fees and has provided his prisoner trust account report. Dockets 26, 27. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (the “Act”), a prisoner who “files an appeal in forma pauperis . . . shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1). This obligation arises “the moment the prisoner . . . files an appeal.” Henderson v. Norris,

129 F.3d 481, 483

(8th Cir. 1997) (omission in original) (quoting In re Tyler,

110 F.3d 528

, 529–30 (8th Cir. 1997)). “[W]hen an inmate seeks pauper status, the only issue is whether the inmate pays the entire fee at the initiation of the proceeding or over a period of time under an installment plan.”

Id.

(quoting McGore v.

Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601, 604

(6th Cir. 1997)). “[P]risoners who appeal judgments in civil cases must sooner or later pay the appellate filing fees in full.”

Id.

(citing Newlin v. Helman,

123 F.3d 429, 432

(7th Cir. 1997)). In Henderson, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals set forth “the procedure to be used to assess, calculate, and collect” appellate filing fees in compliance with the Act.

Id.

First, the court must determine whether the appeal is taken in good faith.

Id.

at 485 (citing

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3)). Then, so long as the prisoner has provided the court with a certified copy of his

prisoner trust account, the court must “calculate the initial appellate partial filing fee as provided by § 1915(b)(1), or determine that the provisions of § 1915(b)(4) apply.” Id. The initial partial filing fee must be 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the 6- month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1). Nonetheless, no prisoner will be “prohibited from . . . appealing a civil or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee.”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(4). It appears that Childers’ appeal is taken in good faith. Because Childers’ prisoner trust account report (Docket 27) shows an average monthly deposit of $7.73 and an average monthly balance of $0.14, the court finds that

§ 1915(b)(1) applies and waives his initial partial filing fee. Thus, it is ORDERED: 1. That Childers’ motion for leave to appeal without prepayment of fees (Docket 26) is granted. 2. That the institution having custody of Childers is directed that whenever the amount in Childers’ trust account, exclusive of funds available to him in his frozen account, exceeds $10, monthly payments that equal 20 percent of the funds credited to the account the preceding

month shall be forwarded to the United States District Court Clerk’s office pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(2), until the appellate filing fee of $505 is paid in full. Dated June 7, 2022. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen E. Schreier KAREN E. SCHREIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown