Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Bordeaux v. South Dakota, State of

District Court, D. South Dakota

Bordeaux v. South Dakota, State of

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS _ CENTRAL DIVISION

ROCHELLE ROWANE BORDEAUX #2289069 PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:25-cv-326-DPM

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA and DOES, Officers, Judges, Minnehaha* County; Officers, Pennington Co. Jail DEFENDANTS

LACHARA MARIE BORDEAUX PLAINTIFF

V. No. 4:25-cv-327-DPM

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA and DOES, Officers, Judges, Minnehaha County; Officers, Pennington Co. Jail DEFENDANTS

RYLEY WARREN BORDEAUX PLAINTIFF

v. No. 4:25-cv-328-DPM

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA and DOES, Officers, Judges, Minnehaha County; Officers, Pennington Co. Jail DEFENDANTS

‘The Court directs the Clerk to update the dockets with the correct spelling of the county name.

ORDER The plaintiffs submitted these

42 U.S.C. § 1983

cases for filing in this district. From the facts alleged and the Defendants named, venue properly lies in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota.

28 U.S.C. § 1391

(b). The Court finds that the interests of justice would be best served by transferring the cases.

28 U.S.C. § 1406

(a). The Court directs the Clerk to transfer the entire case files to the United

_ States District Court for the District of South Dakota. The transfer is immediate because the receiving Court is also in the Eighth Circuit. Compare In re Nine Mile Limited,

673 F.2d 242, 243

(8th Cir. 1982). So Ordered. pPrvgnstall D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge MH Apel A025 __

-2-

Reference

Status
Unknown
↑