Thomas v. Runge

District Court, D. South Dakota

Thomas v. Runge

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

JUAN D. THOMAS, JR., 4:25-CV-04153-CCT

Plaintiff,

vs.

ZACHARY RUNGE, Correctional Officer at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in his individual capacity; ISSAC BOYER, Correctional Officer at South Dakota ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S State Penitentiary, in his individual MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED capacity; KAILEY BRUNZ, Correctional IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND Officer at South Dakota State REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY AN Penitentiary, in her individual capacity; INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE DR. AARON HAYNES, Medical Director at South Dakota Department of Corrections, in his individual capacity; DESIRAE KUMMER, Medical Charge Nurse at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in her individual capacity; STEPHANIE RAMSDELL, Housing Sergeant at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in her individual capacity; MICHAEL BIGGINS, Senior Correctional Officer at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in his individual capacity; JOSEPH ROEMMICH, Warden at South Dakota State Penitentiary, in his individual and official capacity; and KELLIE WASKO, Secretary of Corrections at South Dakota Department of Corrections, in her individual and official capacity,

Defendants.

Plaintiff, Juan D. Thomas, Jr., an inmate at the South Dakota State Penitentiary, filed a pro se civil rights lawsuit. Docket 1. Thomas moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted a copy of his prisoner trust account report. Dockets 2, 3. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner who “brings a civil

action or files an appeal in forma pauperis . . . shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1). The court may, however, accept partial payment of the initial filing fee where appropriate. Thus, “[w]hen an inmate seeks pauper status, the only issue is whether the inmate pays the entire fee at the initiation of the proceeding or over a period of time under an installment plan.” Henderson v. Norris,

129 F.3d 481, 483

(8th Cir. 1997) (per curiam) (alteration in original) (quoting McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601, 604

(6th Cir. 1997)).

The initial partial filing fee that accompanies an installment plan is calculated according to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(1), which requires a payment of 20 percent of the greater of: (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner=s account for the 6- month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.

Thomas reports an average monthly deposit of $136.57 and an average monthly balance of $718.08. Docket 3 at 1. Based on the information regarding Thomas’ prisoner trust account, the court grants Thomas leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but he must pay an initial partial filing fee of $143.62 (20 percent of his average monthly balance). Thomas must pay the initial partial filing fee of $143.62 by September 13, 2025. Failure to pay the initial partial filing fee by September 13, 2025, will result in dismissal without prejudice of Thomas’ complaint for failure to prosecute. Thus, it is ORDERED:

1. That Thomas’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket 2) is granted. Thomas must make a payment of $143.62 by September 13, 2025, made payable to the Clerk, U.S. District Court. If Thomas does not pay the initial partial filing fee by September 13, 2025, his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 2. That the Clerk of Court will send a copy of this order to the appropriate financial official at Thomas’ institution. 3. That the institution having custody of Thomas is directed that whenever

the amount in Thomas’ trust account, exclusive of funds available to him in his frozen account, exceeds $10.00, monthly payments that equal 20 percent of the funds credited the preceding month to Thomas’ trust account shall be forwarded to the U.S. District Court Clerk’s Office under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(b)(1) until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Dated August 19, 2025. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Camela C. Theeler CAMELA C. THEELER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown