Searle v. City of Lead
South Dakota Supreme Court
Searle v. City of Lead, 10 S.D. 405 (S.D. 1898)
73 N.W. 913; 1898 S.D. LEXIS 9
Haney
Searle v. City of Lead
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the circuit court in this action having been affirmed (10 S. D. 312, 73 N. W, 101), defendant and appellant now appeals from the clerk’s taxation of costs. The plaintiff and respondent made no argument, either oral or printed. She should have been allowed five' dollars “before argument,” but nothing “for argument.” Comp. Laws, § 5187. The clerk is directed to deduct the sum allowed for argument, and, as thus modified, the taxation is affirmed.
Reference
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Under Comp. Laws, § 5187, providing- for a certain amount as costs on appeal before argument, and a certain amount for argument, a party making no argument, either oral or written, on appeal, is not entitled to costs for argument.