Johnson v. Incorporated Town of Castlewood
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Krebs v. City of Rapid City (S.D. 1985)
- Smith v. City of Rapid City (S.D. 1981)
- Zajicek v. City of Wessington (S.D. 1928)
- General Discount Corp. v. Schram (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1942)
- Kaiser v. Town of Ravinia (S.D. 1931)
- Klosterman v. City of Elkton (S.D. 1928)
- Lacome v. Town of Dolton (S.D. 1925)
- Kreger v. City of Clear Lake (S.D. 1923)
- Thiel v. City of Alexandria (S.D. 1919)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition filed toy appellants, requesting that a‘certain half section of land, owned toy appellants, be excluded from the incorporated town of' Castlewood. The petition was -originally filed with the board of trustees of said town -of Castlewood, under the provisions of sections 1508-1512, Pol. Code, and was-, by -that board, rejected. The petition was then filed in the -circuit court o-f Hamlin county, where trial was had. The petition con-ced-ediy states facts sufficient to- entitle the petitioners to the relief prayed for, and the evidence submitted on behalf of petitioners at the trial appears to-prove the.facts alleged- in the petition. -But, at ¡the -close of the trial, the court made a purported finding of fact a's follows:
“That the request of the petitioners and -plaintiffs -contained in their petition herein cannot be granted without injustice to- ¡the inhabitants of the said1 town and the persons interested.”
There is n-o evidence to support this finding. The evidence does not show thait the inhabitants will suffer any injustice by the granting of the petition, nor does- it appear that the petitioners derive any benefit whatever from being included within the corporate limits of the said town. No reason of any kind appears why the granting of the petition should be objected to by the; -defendant, except that, so long- as the premises involved remain within the
The judgment and order appealed from- are reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.