Huset v. Clements
Huset v. Clements
Opinion of the Court
In this action plaintiff is seeking to recover damages for conversion of an automobile on which plaintiff had a chattel mortgage. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court overruled the demurrer, and the defendant appeals.
No useful purpose would be served by setting out the complaint in full. It certainly is not a model pleading nor one to be commended to general use, but it contains sufficient matter to
The complaint cannot be said to be definite and certain, but it does state a cause of action, and the demurrer was. properly overruled.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.