South Dakota Supreme Court, 1933

Storm v. Armour

Storm v. Armour
South Dakota Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
248 N.W. 491; 61 S.D. 304; 1933 S.D. LEXIS 38 (North Western Reporter)

Storm v. Armour

Opinion of the Court

The defendant has appealed from a judgment based upon findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court. The plaintiff has attempted to file a cross-appeal from the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial. The record is confused. It is apparent, however, that the findings of fact will not support the conclusions of law or judgment.

The case is reversed, and a new trial ordered. Costs will be taxed in this court against the plaintiff below.

RUDOLPH, P.J., and POLLEY, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, and WARREN, JJ., concur. *Page 305

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.