South Dakota Supreme Court, 1936

In re Hosford

In re Hosford
South Dakota Supreme Court · Decided March 7, 1936 · Fisher, Han, Hon, Ninth, Place, Pouley, Roberts, Seventh, Uby
64 S.D. 161; 265 N.W. 598

In re Hosford

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM..

The above-entitled applicant, having been disbarred from the practice of law by previous opinion of this court (In re Hosford, 62 S. D. 374, 252 N. W. 843), has made application for reinstatement; the Attorney General of this state appearing in opposition thereto. Applicant appeared in person and by counsel, and the matter has been fully submitted! to, and considered by, the court. Prom the petition and facts presented in support thereof when considered with the previous record of the applicant, the same are deemed insufficient to warrant his reinstatement. The judges are of the opinion, therefore, that saidl application should be denied.

Hon. H. R. HAN'UBY, the Judge of the Seventh Circuit, and Hon. FRANK R. FISHER, one of the Judges of the Ninth Circuit, sitting in place of Judges POULEY and' ROBERTS, disqualified.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.