South Dakota Supreme Court, 1938

Lang v. T.J. Tobin Const. Co.

Lang v. T.J. Tobin Const. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court · Decided December 30, 1938 · PER CURIAM.
283 N.W. 169; 66 S.D. 365; 1938 S.D. LEXIS 72 (North Western Reporter)
Lang v. T.J. Tobin Const. Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The facts in this case bring it within the rule announced in Humphreys v. Construction Co., 66 S.D. 112, 279 N.W. 246. It appears that the respondent, Lang, had been employed by the defendant construction company a full year prior to the time of the accident, but under the rule laid down in the Humphreys Case, this fact does not determine the applicable statute, if the employment is such that it is the custom to operate for only a part of the working days each year. The Industrial Commissioner and the trial court held that Subdivision 1 of Section 9461, R.C. 1919, was applicable to the facts here presented. We are of the opinion that this was error. Under the facts presented and under the rule of the Humphreys Case Subdivision 5 of said Section 9461, R.C. 1919, must be used as the basis for computing claimant's total annual earnings.

The judgment and order appealed from are reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.