Gold v. Miller Brick Co.
Gold v. Miller Brick Co.
283 N.W. 153; 66 S.D. 334; 1938 S.D. LEXIS 65
(North Western Reporter)
Gold v. Miller Brick Co.
Opinion of the Court
The principal assignment argued by appellants deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of fact. No useful purpose will be served by detailing the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have carefully considered the *Page 335 record and are of the opinion that there is ample support for the findings in the evidence.
Other assignments have been examined and need not be discussed for the reason that no prejudice to appellants is shown.
The judgment and order of the trial court are affirmed.
All the Judges concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.