Gold v. Miller Brick Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Gold v. Miller Brick Co., 66 S.D. 334 (S.D. 1938)
283 N.W. 153
Gold v. Miller Brick Co.
Opinion of the Court
The principal assignment argued by appellants deals with the sufficiency of the evidence to support certain findings of fact. No useful purpose will be served by detailing the evidence. Suffice it to say that we have carefully considered the
■Other assignments have 'been examined and need not be discussed for the reason that no prejudice to appellants is shown.
The judgment and order of the trial court are affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- GOLD, Trustee of the Estate of Ervin J. Miller, Bankrupt v. MILLER BRICK CO., INC.
- Status
- Published