Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1995

Frances Gregg Brickell and Edwina Ellis Coffey v. City of Friendsville

Frances Gregg Brickell and Edwina Ellis Coffey v. City of Friendsville
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided December 6, 1995 · Judge Don T. McMurray

Frances Gregg Brickell and Edwina Ellis Coffey v. City of Friendsville

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS FILED December 6, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk FRANCES GREGG BRI CKELL a nd ) BLOUNT CI RCUI T EDW NA ELLI S COFFEY, I ) 1 C. A. NO. 03A01- 9505- CV- 00115 9 ) Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l e e s ) ) ) ) ) ) vs . ) HON. W DALE YOUNG . ) J UDGE ) ) ) ) ) CI TY OF FRI ENDSVI LLE, ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED ) De f e nda nt - Appe l l a nt )

M CHAEL H. M I EARES, M r yvi l l e , f or a ppe l l a nt . a

DAVI D T. BLACK, M r yvi l l e , f or a ppe l l e e . a

O P I N I O N

M M r a y, J . c ur

Th i s i s a n e xt r a or di na r y a ppe a l i n t he mos t l i t e r a l s e ns e o f t he wo r d. The a ppe l l a nt pr e va i l e d i n t he t r i a l c our t , but ne ve r t h e - l e s s , h a s a ppe a l e d c l a i mi n g t ha t t he t r i a l c our t e r r e d i n r e f us i n g t o c o n s o l i da t e t hi s a c t i on wi t h a not he r a c t i on r e l a t i ng t o t he s a me s u b j e c t ma t t e r pe ndi ng i n t he s a me c our t .

The pl a i nt i f f s f i l e d t he i r c ompl a i nt s e e ki ng a de c l a r a t o r y j u d g me n t a s t o t he owne r s hi p of a n a ba ndone d r a i l r oa d r i ght - of - wa y .

Th e r a i l r oa d r i ght - of - wa y ha s be e n f or ma l l y a ba ndone d by CSX Tr a n s p o r t a t i on, I nc . , or i t s pr e de c e s s or i n t i t l e a nd no i s s ue i s ma d e r e g a r di ng t he a ba ndonme nt . The pl a i nt i f f s s ought t he c our t ’ s j u d g me n t t ha t t he Ci t y of Fr i e nds vi l l e ha d no owne r s hi p r i ght t o t he a b a ndone d r i ght - of - wa y. The p l a i nt i f f s f ur t he r s ough t a d e t e r mi na t i on a s t o whe t h e r t he a c t i vi t i e s of t he Ci t y upon t h e pr ope r t y c ons t i t ut e d a t a ki ng by i nve r s e c onde mna t i on. Th e p l a i nt i f f s f i l e d a mot i on f or pa r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt on t he i s s u e o f o wn e r s hi p of t he a ba ndone d r i ght - of - wa y. The Ci t y r e s ponde d t o t he mo t i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt a nd i n i t s r e s pons e a gr e e d t h a t t he r e wa s no i s s ue of ma t e r i a l f a c t r e l a t i ng t o o wn e r s hi p of t h e p r o p e r t y a nd a gr e e d t ha t t he pr ope r t y r e ve r t e d t o t he a dj oi n i n g l a n d o wn e r s as a l l e ge d in t he c ompl a i nt . The Ci t y a s s e r t e d, h o we v e r , t ha t t he r e wa s a ge nui ne i s s ue of ma t e r i a l f act as t o wh e t h e r t he Ci t y ha d i nv e r s e l y c onde mne d pl a i nt i f f s ’ pr ope r t y b y i t s a c t i on a s a l l e ge d i n t he c ompl a i nt . The Ci t y f ur t he r a s s e r t e d t ha t i f t he r e ha d be e n a t a ki ng by i nve r s e c onde mna t i on, t he Ci t y ’ s a c t i o n wa s b a r r e d b y t he s t a t ut e of l i mi t a t i ons c ont a i ne d i n T. C. A.

§ 2 9 - 1 6 - 124. Al t e r na t i ve l y, t h e Ci t y i ns i s t e d t ha t i f t he r e wa s n o

i n v e r s e c onde mna t i on, t he n t he i s s ue s we r e l i mi t e d t o a n a c t i on f o r t r e s pa s s . Fur t he r , t h e Ci t y i ns i s t e d i n i t s r e s pons e t o t he mot i o n f or s u mma r y j udgme nt t ha t t he c a s e s houl d be c ons ol i da t e d wi t h M Co l l um, c et al v. Ci t y of Fr i e nds vi l l e , a s i mi l a r case t he n p e n d i n g i n t he s a me c our t , f or f e a r t ha t a “ f a i l ur e t o c ons ol i da t e t he s e a c t i ons s ubj e c t s t he de f e nda n t t o t he r i s k of i nc ons i s t e n t d e t e r mi na t i on o n t he i s s ue of i nve r s e c onde mna t i on a nd woul d r u n c o n t r a r y t o j udi c i a l e c onomy. ”

Su bs e que nt t o t he r e s pons e t o t he mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme n t , t he Ci t y f i l e d i t s a ns we r . I n t he a ns we r , t h e Ci t y a dmi t t e d t ha t i t h a d “ gr a de d, l a nds c a pe d a nd s owe d” t he f or me r r a i l r oa d r i ght - o f - wa y a n d a ve r r e d t ha t it h a d done s o s i nc e 1988. The Ci t y a ga i n a s s e r t e d t he s t a t ut e o f l i mi t a t i ons .

A h e a r i ng wa s he l d on t he mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt a nd u p o n t he i s s u e of c ons ol i da t i on. The c our t s us t a i ne d t h e p l a i nt i f f s ’ mo t i on f or pa r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt r ul i ng t ha t t he a ba ndo n e d r i g h t - of - wa y r e ve r t e d to t he a dj oi ni ng l a ndowne r s . The c our t d e n i e d t he mot i on t o c ons o l i da t e .

Su bs e que nt t o t he s us t a i ni ng of t he pl a i nt i f f s ’ mot i on f o r p a r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt , t he de f e nda nt f i l e d a mot i on f or pa r t i a l s u mma r y j udgme n t a ve r r i ng t ha t t he r e wa s no ge nui ne i s s ue of ma t e r i a l f act on t he i s s ue of i nve r s e c onde mna t i on a nd t ha t t he

Ci t y wa s e nt i t l e d t o j udgme nt as a ma t t e r of l a w. The Ci t y a s s e r t e d i n i t s mot i on t ha t “ t he de f e nda nt [ Ci t y] i s e nt i t l e d t o p a r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt a s a ma t t e r of l a w hol di ng t ha t t he Ci t y o f Fr i e n ds vi l l e ha d not i nve r s e l y c onde mne d t he pr ope r t y a t i s s ue . ”

Af t e r a he a r i ng on J a nua r y 31, 1995, t he c our t e nt e r e d i t s j u d g me n t . I n t he j udgme nt t he c our t r e c i t e d t ha t t he pl a i nt i f f s t h r o u g h c ouns e l a dvi s e d t he c our t t ha t t he y di d not r es i s t t he Ci t y’ s mot i on f or pa r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt a nd t ha t t he y wo u l d a gr e e t o t he gr a nt i ng of pa r t i a l s umma r y j udgme nt i n or de r t o h a v e t he ma t t e r f i na l l y r e s ol ve d. The pl a i nt i f f s a l s o a nn o u n c e d t h a t t he y wo u l d vol unt a r i l y di s mi s s t he i r c l a i m f or da ma ge s f or t r e s p a s s s o t h a t a f i na l or de r c oul d be e nt e r e d. The a ppe l l a nt pr e va i l e d o n al l i s s u e s r e l a t i ng t o t he me r i t s of t he c a s e . It i s f r om t hi s j u d g me n t t ha t t he Ci t y a ppe a l s .

Fi r s t l y t he r e is no r e qui r e me nt t ha t s e pa r a t e cases h a ve c o n s i s t e nt j udgme nt s . Ea c h c a s e mu s t s t a nd or f al l on i t s o wn me r i t s . The Ci t y a s s ume s t he pos i t i on t ha t t hi s c a s e wa s de c i de d o n t he s a me f a c t s a s M Col l um c , s upr a . Suc h, howe ve r , i s not t h e case. In t hi s cas e, as oppos e d to M Col l um, c t he p l a i nt i f f s c on c e de d t ha t t he r e wa s no ge nui ne i s s ue of a ma t e r i a l f act r e l a t i ng t o i nve r s e c ond e mn a t i on, a nd, t h e r e f or e , t h e Ci t y wa s e n t i t l e d t o a j udgme nt a s a ma t t e r of l a w t ha t t he r e ha d be e n n o t a k i ng . Fur t he r , t h e y wi t hdr e w t he i r c l a i ms f or t r e s pa s s t o t he i r

p r o p e r t y. The Ci t y c onc e de d t ha t i t ha d no owne r s hi p i nt e r e s t i n t he p r o p e r t y i n que s t i on. I n t hi s c a s e t he r e wa s no j us t i c i a b l e i s s ue l e f t f or t he c our t t o de c i de e xc e pt t he a s s e s s me nt of c os t s .

No i s s u e i s ma de r e ga r di ng t he a s s e s s me nt of c os t s .

Fo r a c ont r ove r s y t o be r e ga r de d a s " j us t i c i a bl e " t he r e mu s t e xi s t a r eal i s s ue or que s t i on r a t he r t ha n a t he or e t i c a l or s p e c u l a t i ve one . In a ddi t i on, t he f act s mus t be r i pe f or a j ud i c i a l a dj us t m nt . e He s t e r v. M i c Vi l l a ge U. S. A. , us I nc . , 692 S. W 2 d 4 26 ( Te nn. App. 1985) , c i t i ng Pa r ks v. Al e xa nde r , 608 S. W 2 d . .

8 8 1 ( Te n n. App. 1980) . Obv i ous l y t hi s c a s e doe s not me e t t he t e s t .

On t he ot he r ha nd, i n M Col l um, t h e pl a i nt i f f s s t i l l s ough t a c d e t e r mi na t i on t ha t t he r e ha d be e n a n i nve r s e t a ki ng a nd t ha t t h e p l a i n t i f f s we r e e nt i t l e d t o a t t or ne y’ s f e e s , not onl y f or i nve r s e c o n d e mn a t i on but a l s o f or a ba ndonme nt of a c onde mna t i on a c t i o n pur s ua nt t o T. C. A. § 29- 1 7- 812. Obvi ous l y a j us t i c i a bl e i s s u e r e ma i n e d i n M Col l um. c

Fi na l l y, t h e ma t t e r of c ons ol i da t i on a ddr e s s e s i t s e l f t o t he s o u n d d i s c r e t i on of t he t r i a l c our t . Rul e 42. 01, Te nne s s e e Rul e s o f Ci v i l Pr oc e dur e pr ovi de s a s f ol l ows :

McCollum was also appealed to this court. The transcript of the proceedings filed in McCollum and in this case are identical.

42. 01 Cons ol i dat i on. — W n a c t i ons i nvol vi ng a he c o mmon q u e s t i o n of l a w or f a c t a r e pe ndi ng be f or e a c o ur t , t he c our t ma y or de r a l l t he a c t i ons c ons ol i da t e d o r he a r d j oi nt l y, a nd ma y ma ke s uc h or de r s c onc e r ni ng p r o c e e di ngs t he r e i n a s ma y t e nd t o a voi d unne c e s s a r y c o s t s or de l a y. W n t he a c t i ons a r e t o be t r i e d be f or e he a j ur y, t h e j oi nt he a r i ng or t r i a l s ha l l be on a l l of t he ma t t e r s i n i s s ue i n t he a c t i ons , e xc e pt a s t o i s s ue s on whi c h j ur y t r i a l ha s be e n wa i ve d by a l l pa r t i e s . W n t he he a c t i ons a r e not t o be t r i e d be f or e a j ur y, t he j oi nt h e a r i ng or t r i a l ma y be on a l l or a ny of t he ma t t e r s i n i s s ue i n t he a c t i ons .

I n Va n Za ndt v. Da nc e , 827 S. W 2d 785 ( Te nn. App. 1991) , t h e . c o u r t s pe a ki ng of Rul e 42. 01 s t a t e d:

The us e of t he t e r m " ma y" i n t he i ni t i a l por t i on of t hi s Rul e c l e a r l y gi ve s t he t r i a l c our t di s c r e t i on a s t o wh e t he r t he f a c t s o f a pa r t i c ul a r c a s e me r i t c ons ol i da - t i o n of c a s e s of t ha t t ype . 1 Am. J ur . 2d, Ac t i ons i n c ha pt e r VI I I e nt i t l e d " Cons ol i da t i on of Ac t i ons " ha s t hi s t o s a y: § 157. Cons ol i da t i on a s ma t t e r of r i ght or di s c r e t i on.

I n t he a bs e nc e o f s t a t ut e , t he c ons ol i da t i on of a c t i ons i s not a ma t t e r of r i ght , b ut r e s t s i n t he s ound d i s c r e t i on of t he c our t , a nd i t s di s c r e t i on i n or de r i ng o r r e f us i ng c ons ol i da t i on wi l l not be i nt e r f e r e d wi t h u n l e s s a bus e d.

Va n Za n dt , a t pa ge 787.

W a gr e e wi t h our c o l l e a gue s t ha t e t he que s t i on i s a ma t t e r whi c h a ddr e s s e s i t s e l f t o t he di s c r e t i on of t he t r i a l c our t a nd t he c our t ’ s j u d gme nt t he r e on wi l l not be di s t ur be d a bs e nt a cl ear s h o wi n g of a bus e of di s c r e t i on.

W f i nd no a bus e of di s c r e t i on on t he pa r t of t he t r i a l c ou r t . e Fu r t h e r , we f i nd no me r i t i n t he i s s ue pr e s e nt e d f or r e vi e w by t h e a pp e l l a nt . We a f f i r m t he j udgme nt of t he t r i al c our t i n al l r e s pe c t s . Cos t s of t hi s a ppe a l a r e t a xe d t o t he a ppe l l a nt a nd t h i s c a s e i s r e ma nde d t o t he t r i a l c our t f or t he c ol l e c t i on t he r e of .

________________________________ _ _ Don T. M M r a y, J . c ur

CONCUR: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________________________ He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____________________________ Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J .

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS

FRANCES GREGG BRI CKELL a nd ) BLOUNT CI RCUI T EDW NA ELLI S COFFEY, I ) C. A. NO. 03A01- 9505- CV- 00115 9 ) Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l e e s ) ) ) ) ) ) vs . ) HON. W DALE YOUNG . ) J UDGE ) ) ) ) ) CI TY OF FRI ENDSVI LLE, ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED ) De f e nda nt - Appe l l a nt )

ORDER

Thi s a ppe a l c a me on t o be he a r d upon t he r e c or d f r om t h e Ci r c u i t Cour t of Bl ount Count y, br i e f s a nd a r gume nt o f c ouns e l .

Up o n c o n s i de r a t i on t he r e of , t hi s Cour t i s of t he opi ni on t ha t t he r e wa s n o r e ve r s i bl e e r r or i n t he t r i a l c our t .

W a f f i r m t he j udgme nt e of t he t r i a l c our t i n al l r e s pe c t s .

Cos t s o f t hi s a ppe a l a r e t a xe d t o t he a ppe l l a nt a nd t hi s c a s e i s r e ma n d e d t o t he t r i a l c our t f or t he c ol l e c t i on t he r e of .

PER CURI AM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.