Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1995

Debra White v. Robin Merritt, Judy Merritt, and Bill Sharp

Debra White v. Robin Merritt, Judy Merritt, and Bill Sharp
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided December 6, 1995 · Presiding Judge Houston M. Goddard

Debra White v. Robin Merritt, Judy Merritt, and Bill Sharp

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON FILED December 6, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk DEBRA W TE HI ) KNOX COUNTY ) 03A01- 9505- CV- 00165 Pl a i nt i f f - Appe l l a nt ) ) ) v. ) HON. W HEELER ROSENBALM, ) J UDGE ) ROBI N M ERRI TT, J UDY MERRI TT, ) a n d BI LL SHARP ) ) De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED

DENNI S B. FRANCI S OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLANT TERRY L. ADKI NS OF KNOXVI LLE FOR APPELLEE BI LL SHARP

O P I N I O N

Godda r d, P. J .

Pur s ua nt t o Rul e 54 of t he Te nne s s e e Rul e s of Appe l l a t e Pr o c e du r e , t he Pl a i nt i f f , De br a W t e , a ppe a l s a n or de r of hi s u mma r y j udgme nt e nt e r e d i n f a vor of t he De f e nda nt , Bi l l Sha r p. M . W i t e s ought da ma ge s s he s uf f e r e d a s a r e s ul t of a dog bi t e . s h Th e s u i t wa s br ought a ga i ns t M . Sha r p, t he owne r of t he pr e mi s e s r wh e r e t he dog wa s ke pt , a nd hi s t e na nt s , Robi n M r r i t t a nd J ud y e M r r i t t , t he owne r s of t he dog. e A vol unt a r y non- s ui t wa s t a ke n a s t o M . M r r i t t a nd a de f a ul t j udgme nt wa s e nt e r e d a ga i ns t M s . r e r Mrritt. e

M . Sha r p ma de a mot i on f or s umma r y j udgme nt whi c h wa s r gr a nt e d. Our r e vi e w of t he r e c or d pe r s ua de s us t hi s i s a n a p p r o p r i a t e c a s e f or a f f i r ma nc e unde r Rul e 10( a ) of t hi s Cour t .

The Tr i a l Cour t i s a c c or di ngl y a f f i r me d a nd t he c a us e r e ma n d e d f or c ol l e c t i on of c os t s be l ow. Cos t s of a ppe a l a r e a d j u d g e d a ga i ns t t he Pl a i nt i f f a nd he r s ur e t y.

_______________________________ Hous t on M Godda r d, P. J . .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ Cl i f f or d E. Sa nde r s , Sr . J .

Ru l e 1 0 . ( a) Af f i r ma n c e W t h o u t Op i n i o n . i Th e Co u r t , wi t h t h e c o n c u r r e n c e o f a l l j u d g e s p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e c a s e , ma y a f f i r m t he ac t i on of t h e t r i a l c o u r t b y o r d e r wi t h o u t r e n d e r i n g a f o r ma l o p i n i o n wh e n a n o p i n i o n wo u l d h a v e n o p r e c e d e n t i a l v a l u e a n d o n e o r mo r e o f t h e f o l l o wi n g c i r c u ms t a n c e s e x i s t a n d a r e d i s p o s i t i v e o f t h e a p p e a l : ( 1) t h e Co u r t c o n c u r s i n t h e f a c t s a s f o u n d o r a s f ound by ne c e s s a r y i mp l i c a t i o n b y t h e t r i a l c o u r t .

( 2) t h e r e i s ma t e r i a l evi de nc e t o s uppor t t he ver di c t of t he j ur y.

( 3) no r e ve r s i bl e e r r or of l a w a ppe a r s .

S u c h c a s e s ma y b e a f f i r me d a s f o l l o ws : " Af f i r me d i n a c c o r d a n c e wi t h Co u r t o f Ap p e a l s Ru l e 1 0 ( a ) . "

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.