Rick Haynes and Karen Haynes v. John Walker and wife Rosa Mae Walker and Harold Woods
Rick Haynes and Karen Haynes v. John Walker and wife Rosa Mae Walker and Harold Woods
Opinion
I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON FILED October 2, 1995 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk RI CK HAYNES a nd ) J EFFERSON COUNTY KAREN HAYNES ) 03A01- 9504- CH- 00133 ) Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s ) ) ) v. ) HON. CHESTER S. ) RAI NWATER, J R. , ) CHANCELLOR J OHN WALKER a nd wi f e ) ROSA M AE WALKER a nd ) HAROLD W OODS ) ) De f e nda nt s - Appe l l e e s ) AFFI RMED AND REMANDED
CARL R. OGLE, J R. , OF J EFFERSON CI TY FOR APPELLANTS J AMES R. SCROGGI NS OF J EFFERSON CI TY FOR APPELLEES
O P I N I O N
Godda r d, P. J .
The Pl a i nt i f f s , Ri c k Ha yne s a nd hi s wi f e Ka r e n Ha yne s , i n i t i a l l y s ue d t he i r a dj a c e nt l a ndowne r s , De f e nda nt s J ohn W l k e r a a n d wi f e Ros a M e W l ke r a nd Ha r ol d W a a oods . The Pl a i nt i f f s s ou g h t a d e c l a r a t i on t ha t t he y we r e e nt i t l e d t o a r i ght - of - wa y t o ga i n a c c e s s t o t r a c t 8 of t he Cl i nt J one s pr ope r t y, a 15. 72- a c r e t r a c t o wn e d b y t he m i n J e f f e r s on Count y. The r e a f t e r , M c ha e l W i oods a n d h i s wi f e Pa ul a Young Woods , who a c qui r e d a por t i on of Ha r ol d W ods ' o pr ope r t y, we r e a dde d a s pa r t y De f e nda nt s by a n a gr e e d or de r .
The Pl a i nt i f f s c ont e nd t ha t t he r i ght - of - wa y i n q u e s t i o n wa s f or me r l y a publ i c r oa d, known a s t he Ol d M l l s i Sp r i n g Roa d, a nd ha d ne ve r be e n of f i c i a l l y c l os e d. The y a l s o a s s e r t t ha t t he i r p r e de c e s s or s i n t i t l e a c qui r e d a n i nt e r e s t b y p r e s c r i pt i on a nd, f ur t he r , t ha t t hi s r oa dwa y " pr ovi de s t he onl y s u i t a b l e me a ns of i ngr e s s a nd e gr e s s t o t he i r pr ope r t y, " p r e s u ma bl y a l l e gi ng t ha t t he y a r e e nt i t l e d t o a r i ght - of - wa y b y n e c e s s i t y.
The Tr i a l Cour t f i r s t f ound t ha t t he Pl a i nt i f f s ha d n o t c a r r i e d t he i r bur de n t o s how t ha t t he r oa d i n que s t i on wa s e ve r a p u b l i c r oa d a nd, e ve n ha d t he y done s o, i t ha d be e n " a ba ndone d 0 o r mor e ye a r s a go. "
The Pl a i nt i f f s a ppe a l r a i s i ng t he f ol l owi ng i s s ue :
WHETHER THE CHANCELLOR ERRED I N HOLDI NG THAT THE PLAI NTI FFS FAI LED TO PROVE THE EXI STENCE OF A PUBLI C ROAD CONSTI TUTI NG A RI GHT- OF- W TO THE PLAI NTI FFS' AY PROPERTY, THAT SUCH PUBLI C ROAD HAD BEEN ABANDONED, AND THAT THI S ROADW DI D NOT CONSTI TUTE AN EASEM AY ENT BY NECESSI TY.
The onl y e vi de nc e i n t he r e c or d t ha t t hi s wa s e ve r a p u b l i c r oa d a r e c e r t a i n r e f e r e nc e s i n de e ds t o t he pa r t i e s a nd t o t h e i r p r e de c e s s or s i n t i t l e , s ome of whi c h s pe a k of " a r oa d, " a n d o t h e r s of " a n ol d r oa d , " a nd t he " Ol d M l l Spr i ngs Roa d. " i Th e s e d e e ds , howe ve r , do not r e f e r t o a publ i c r oa d. Howe ve r , a s s u mi n g, a s di d t he Cha nc e l l or i n hi s me mor a ndum opi ni on a nd j u d g me n t , t ha t i t wa s i n f a c t a publ i c r oa d, t he undi s put e d t e s t i mo ny i s t ha t i t ha d not be e n known or us e d a s a publ i c r o a d f o r o v e r 50 ye a r s pr i or t o t he he a r i ng be l ow. The r e i s a l s o u n d i s p u t e d t e s t i mony t ha t Cl i nt J one s , whos e c hi l dr e n c onve ye d t h e p r o pe r t y t o t he Pl a i nt i f f s , f e nc e d a c r os s t he r oa d, whi c h wo u l d e vi de nc e a n i nt e nt t o a ba ndon i t . M e ove r , M . J one s or r a l s o c o nve ye d a t r a ns mi s s i on l i ne e a s e me nt t o t he Te nne s s e e Va l l e y Aut hor i t y whi c h s pe a ks of t he r oa d a s " a n a ba ndone d r oa d . " I n v i e w of t he f or e goi ng, we do not be l i e ve t he e vi de nc e p r e p o n d e r a t e s a ga i ns t e i t he r of t he Cha nc e l l or ' s f i ndi ngs .
W t hus c onc l ude t ha t a s t o t he f i r s t t wo poi nt s r a i s e d e b y t h e De f e nda nt s ' i s s ue o n a ppe a l - - t he Cha nc e l l or ' s f i ndi ng t h a t t h e p r o of doe s not e s t a bl i s h t he r oa d i n que s t i on wa s publ i c a n d , e v e n i f s o, i t ha d be e n a ba ndone d- - t hi s i s a n a ppr opr i a t e c a s e f o r a f f i r ma nc e unde r Rul e 10( a ) of t hi s Cour t .
Al t h o u g h n o t a s s e r t e d a s a t h e o r y b y t h e P l a i n t i f f s , a n y p r i v a t e r i g h t a c c r u i n g t o t h e m a f t e r t h e p u b l i c r o a d wa s a b a n d o n e d wo u l d l i k e wi s e h a v e be e n a ba ndone d by t he a c t s o f M . J o ne s . r
Ru l e 1 0 . ( a) Af f i r ma n c e W t h o u t Op i n i o n . i Th e Co u r t , wi t h t h e c o n c u r r e n c e o f a l l j u d g e s p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e c a s e , ma y a f f i r m t he ac t i on of t h e t r i a l c o u r t b y o r d e r wi t h o u t r e n d e r i n g a f o r ma l o p i n i o n wh e n a n o p i n i o n wo u l d h a v e n o p r e c e d e n t i a l v a l u e a n d o n e o r mo r e o f t h e f o l l o wi n g c i r c u ms t a n c e s e x i s t a n d a r e d i s p o s i t i v e o f t h e a p p e a l :
The onl y r e ma i ni ng i s s ue i s whe t he r t he Pl a i nt i f f s a c qu i r e d a n e a s e me nt b y n e c e s s i t y.
The r ul e a s t o s uc h e a s e me nt s i s we l l s t a t e d by t he a u t h o r s of Ame r i c a n J ur i s pr ude nc e Se c ond wi t h a ppr opr i a t e c i t a t i ons a s f ol l ows :
A wa y of ne c e s s i t y i s a n e a s e me nt f ounde d on a n i mpl i e d g r a nt or i mpl i e d r e s e r va t i on. I t ar i s es wh e r e t he r e i s a c onve ya nc e of a pa r t of a t r a c t of l a nd of s uc h na t ur e a nd e xt e nt t ha t e i t he r t he pa r t c o nve ye d or t he pa r t r e t a i ne d i s s hut of f f r om a c c e s s t o a r oa d t o t he out e r wor l d by t he l a nd f r om whi c h i t i s s e ve r e d or by t hi s l a nd a nd t he l a nd of s t r a nge r s .
I n s uc h a s i t ua t i on t he r e i s a n i mpl i e d gr a nt of a wa y a c r os s t he gr a nt or ' s r e ma i ni ng l a nd t o t he pa r t c o nve ye d, or c onve r s e l y, a n i mpl i e d r e s e r va t i on of a wa y t o t he gr a nt or ' s r e ma i ni ng l a nd a c r os s t he por t i on o f t he l a nd c onve ye d. The or de r i n whi c h t wo pa r c e l s o f l a nd a r e c onve ye d ma ke s no di f f e r e nc e i n de t e r mi ni ng wh e t he r t he r e i s a r i ght of wa y by ne c e s s i t y a p pur t e na nt t o e i t he r .
A wa y of ne c e s s i t y r e s ul t s f r om t he a ppl i c a t i on of t h e pr e s umpt i on t ha t whe ne ve r a pa r t y c onve ys pr ope r t y h e c onve ys wha t e ve r i s ne c e s s a r y f or t he be ne f i c i a l us e o f t ha t pr ope r t y a nd r e t a i ns wha t e ve r i s ne c e s s a r y f or t h e be ne f i c i a l us e of l a nd he s t i l l pos s e s s e s . Suc h a wa y i s of c ommon- l a w or i gi n, a nd i s pr e s ume d t o ha ve b e e n i nt e nde d by t he pa r t i e s . A wa y of ne c e s s i t y i s a l s o s a i d t o be s uppor t e d by t he r ul e of publ i c pol i c y t h a t l a nds s houl d not be r e nde r e d unf i t f or oc c upa nc y o r s uc c e s s f ul c ul t i va t i on. W t he r a gr a nt or he r e s e r va t i on of a wa y of ne c e s s i t y s houl d be i mpl i e d, h o we ve r , de pe nds on t he t e r ms of t he c onve ya nc e a nd t he f a c t s o f t he p a r t i c ul a r c a s e . The i mpl i c a t i on wi l l not b e ma de whe r e i t i s s hown t ha t t he pa r t i e s di d not i nt e nd i t . Nor wi l l a n i mpl i e d e a s e me nt of ne c e s s i t y
( 1) t h e Co u r t c o n c u r s i n t h e f a c t s a s f o u n d o r a s f ound by ne c e s s a r y i mp l i c a t i o n b y t h e t r i a l c o u r t .
( 2) t h e r e i s ma t e r i a l evi de nc e t o s uppor t t he ver di c t of t he j ur y.
( 3) no r e ve r s i bl e e r r or of l a w a ppe a r s .
S u c h c a s e s ma y b e a f f i r me d a s f o l l o ws : " Af f i r me d i n a c c o r d a n c e wi t h Co u r t o f Ap p e a l s Ru l e 1 0 ( a ) . " b e j udi c i a l l y r e c ogni z e d whe r e i t i s pr e c l ude d by s t a t ut e .
2 5 Am. J ur . 2d. , Ea s e me nt s a nd Li c e ns e s §35.
W f i r s t obs e r ve t ha t a s t o t he t he or y of e a s e me nt b y e n e c e s s i t y, i t c oul d be c ons i de r e d wa i ve d be c a us e c ouns e l f or t h e Pl a i n t i f f s di d not a s k t he Cour t t o a me nd i t s f i ndi ng t o a ddr e s s t h i s i s s ue . Howe ve r , e ve n i f he ha d done s o, our e xa mi na t i on o f t h e r e c or d di s c l os e s t ha t t he t r a c t owne d by t he Pl a i nt i f f s f r o n t s on a publ i c r oa d f o r ove r 400 f e e t , a nd t ha t t he y a l s o, u p o n p u r c ha s i ng t he pr ope r t y, a c qui r e d a r i ght - of - wa y t o a pub l i c r o a d f r om t he e a s t bounda r y of t he pr ope r t y c onve ye d. I t i s t r ue a s t o t he f r ont a ge on t he publ i c r oa d, t he r e i s pr oof t ha t t he r e i s a b l uf f s ome 10 f e e t hi gh whi c h we a s s ume i s a l ong t he e nt i r e r o a d f r ont a ge of t he i r pr ope r t y. I t i s a l s o t r ue t he r e i s pr o o f t h a t t h e r i ght - of - wa y a c qui r e d i s s t e e p a nd t ur ns s ha r pl y a t a r i g h t a ngl e , ma ki ng us e of i t i nc onve ni e nt a nd uns ui t a bl e .
Eve n i f we a s s ume t ha t t he Pl a i nt i f f s ha ve no r e a s o n a bl e a c c e s s t o t he i r pr ope r t y, whi c h i s not e nt i r e l y c l e a r , t h e i r r i ght - of - wa y of ne c e s s i t y woul d be ove r t he r e ma i ni ng p r o p e r t y of t he s ub- di vi de r s . Thi s r i ght wa s pr e s uma bl y r e c o g n i z e d whe n t he que s t i on a r os e pr i or t o t he Pl a i nt i f f s p u r c h a s i ng t he l a nd, pr ompt i ng t he s ub- di vi de r s t o i nc l ude a r i g h t - o f - wa y i n t he de e d c onve yi ng t r a c t 8 t o t he Pl a i nt i f f s .
Al t hough t he i s s ue i s not r a i s e d, we a l s o r e c ogni z e t h a t t h e Pl a i nt i f f s ha ve a r i ght , i f t he y a r e i nde e d l a ndl oc ke d , a s c o n t e mpl a t e d by Cha pt e r 14, Ti t l e 54, Te nne s s e e Code An n o t a t e d, t o c onde mn a r i ght - of - wa y t o ga i n a c c e s s t o t he i r p r o p e r t y.
For t he f or e goi ng r e a s ons t he j udgme nt of t he Tr i a l Co u r t i s a f f i r me d a nd t he c a us e r e ma nde d f or c ol l e c t i on of c os t s b e l o w. Cos t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d a ga i ns t t he Pl a i nt i f f s a n d t he i r s ur e t y.
_______________________________ Hous t on M Godda r d, P. J . .
CONCUR:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ Do n T. M M r a y, J . c ur
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _________________________ Ch a r l e s D. Sus a no, J r . , J .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.