Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1997

Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk

Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided June 6, 1997 · Justice Herschel P. Franks

Anthony W. Nance and Brandon Nance v. Christopher H. Strunk

Opinion

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON FILED June 6, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk ANTHONY W NANCE, . ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9701- CV- 00037 a n d BRANDON NANCE, ) ) CAMPBELL CI RCUI T Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s , ) ) HON. CONRAD E. TROUTMAN, J R. , v. ) J UDGE ) CHRI STOPHER H. STRUNK, ) AFFI RMED I N PART, ) REVERSED I N PART, De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e . ) AND REM ANDED

VI C PRYOR, BASI STA, PRYOR & BALLOFF, J a c ks bor o, f or Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s .

DANI EL M GASS, O’ NEI L, PARKER & W LLI AM . I SON, Knoxvi l l e , f or De f e nd a nt - Appe l l e e .

DENNI S L. BABB a nd VONDA M LAUGHLI N, BUTLER, VI NES & BABB, .

Kn o x v i l l e , f or De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e , Gua r a nt y Na t i ona l I ns ur a n c e Co mp a n y.

O P I N I O N

Fr a nks . J .

I n t hi s a c t i on a r i s i ng f r om a mot or ve hi c l e a c c i d e nt , t he de f e nda nt s we r e gr a nt e d s umma r y j udgme nt a nd p l a i n t i f f s h a ve a ppe a l e d.

An a c c i de nt o c c ur r e d be t we e n a mot or ve hi c l e dr i ve n b y p l a i nt i f f Na nc e a nd a t r uc k dr i ve n by de f e nda nt St r unk.

Ta k i n g t he e vi de nc e mos t f a vor a bl e t o pl a i nt i f f s , bot h v e h i c l e s we r e t r a ve l i ng nor t h on I nt e r s t a t e 75, t hr ough t he J el l i co Mount a i ns . Pl a i nt i f f wa s dr i vi ng hi s e mpt y f l a t be d t r a c t or t r a i l e r i n t he l e f t l a ne a t a r a t e of a ppr oxi ma t e l y 60 mp h , whe n a gr e y s t a t i on wa gon s udde nl y s we r ve d i n f r ont of h i m, c a us i ng hi m t o move i nt o t he r i ght l a ne t o a voi d t ha t ve hi c l e . De f e nda nt St r unk’ s t r uc k wa s t r a ve l i ng i n t he r i g h t l a n e a t a ppr oxi ma t e l y 10 t o 15 mi l e s pe r hour , a nd pl a i nt i f f ’ s v e h i c l e c ol l i de d wi t h t he r e a r of St r unk’ s t r uc k.

St r unk s t a t e s t ha t he wa s t r a ve l i ng 40 t o 45 mi l e s p e r h o ur a nd ne ve r s a w t he gr e y s t a t i on wa gon i n t he vi c i ni t y , a n d t ha t pl a i nt i f f ’ s ve hi c l e s i mpl y c a me ba r r e l i ng up t he r i g h t l a ne a nd r e a r - e nde d hi m. The dr i ve r of t he gr e y ve hi c l e h a s n e ve r be e n i de nt i f i e d or f ound.

I n p l a i nt i f f ’ s s ui t a ga i ns t De f e nda nt , p l a i nt i f f a l l e g e d t ha t de f e nda nt wa s t r a ve l i ng a t s uc h a n unr e a s ona bl y l o w r a t e of s pe e d s o a s t o i mpe de t r a f f i c on t he hi ghwa y i n v i o l a t i on of T. C. A. §55- 8- 154 a nd hi s ne gl i ge nc e wa s a p r o x i ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i de nt . Re s pondi ng t o de f e nda nt ’ s mo t i o n f or s umma r y j udgme nt , t he Tr i a l Cour t gr a nt e d s umma r y j u d g me nt on t he ba s i s t ha t t he pr oxi ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i d e n t wa s t h e ne gl i ge nt ope r a t i on of t he gr e y mot or ve hi c l e .

Summa r y j udgme nt i s r e vi e we d wi t hout a t t a c hi ng a ny p r e s u mpt i on of c or r e c t ne s s t o t he j udgme nt . M Cal l v . W l de r , c i 1 3 S. W 2d 150, 153 ( Te nn. 1995) . . Summa r y j udgme nt i s a p p r o p r i a t e whe n, vi e wi ng a l l e vi de nc e a nd i nf e r e nc e s i n t h e l i g h t mos t f a vor a bl e t o t he non- movi ng pa r t y, t he r e a r e no d i s p u t e d i s s ue s of ma t e r i a l f a c t a nd t he movi ng pa r t y i s e n t i t l e d t o j udgme nt a s a ma t t e r of l a w. By r d v . Hal l , 847 S. W 2 d 208 ( Te nn. 1993) . .

The s t a t ut e pl e d i n t hi s c a s e r e a ds i n pe r t i ne nt pa r t : M ni m i um s pe e d r e gul at i on - Tur nout s - Pas s i ng bay s - Pe nal t i e s . - ( a ) No pe r s on s ha l l dr i ve a mot or ve hi c l e a t s uc h a s l ow s pe e d a s t o i mpe de t he nor ma l a nd r e a s ona bl e move me nt of t r a f f i c , e xc e pt whe n r e duc e d s pe e d i s ne c e s s a r y f or s a f e ope r a t i on or i n c ompl i a nc e wi t h t he l a w. . . .

T. C. A. § 55- 8- 154( a ) .

Thi s s t a t ut e i s c i t e d i n onl y t wo Te nne s s e e c a s e s , n e i t h e r of whi c h ma de a ny e xpl i c i t de t e r mi na t i on of wha t c o n s t i t ut e s a v i ol a t i on of t he s t a t ut e . 1. W t s v . W l k e r s on at i u p h e l d a j ur y ve r di c t f i ndi ng t he s l ow dr i ve r 40% a t f a ul t f o r a n a c c i de nt . Thi s f i ndi ng of l i a bi l i t y i s c ons i s t e nt wi t h c a s e s i nvol vi ng s i mi l a r s t a t ut e s i n ot he r s t a t e s , whi c h ha v e h e l d a que s t i on of whe t he r s uc h a s t a t ut e ha s be e n vi ol a t e d a n d whe t he r s uc h vi ol a t i on c ons t i t ut e s t he ne gl i ge nt pr oxi ma t e c a u s i n g or c ont r i but i ng t o a n a c c i de nt i s f or t he j ur y. 66 A. L. R. 2d 1194; e . g . , Gr i f f i n v . I l l i noi s Be l l Te l e phone Co . , 8 0 N. E. 2d 228, 230 ( I l l . Ct . App. 1962) ; Fonv i l l e v . Di x on, 9 3 S. E. 2d 406 ( N. C. Ct . App. 1972) ; Le o v . Adams , 208 N. W 2 d .

7 0 6 ( S. D. 1973) ; M na v . Boi s e Cas c ade Cor p. , 681 P. 2d 880 , i 8 4 ( W s h. Ct . App. 1984) . a The s e c a s e s a c knowl e dge t ha t ?d a wd l e r s , a s we l l a s s pe e de r s , c a n be c ome a me na c e t o t he s a f e t y o f t he i r f e l l ow mot or i s t s . ? Che e k v . W i s s , 615 S. W 2 d e .

S e e Ca r r v . Oz b u r n - He s s e y S t o r a g e Co . , 1 9 9 6 W 3 8 3 2 9 5 ( Te n n . Ap p .

L 1996) . I n Ca r r , p l a i n t i f f r e a r - e n d e d d e f e n d a n t , wh o h a d j u s t t u r n e d o n t o t h e h i g h wa y f r o m a n i n t e r s e c t i o n . Th e r e a s o n a b l e n e s s o f t h e d e f e n d a n t ’ s s p e e d , wh i c h wa s n o t d i s p u t e d - 2 0 mp h - wa s n o t d i r e c t l y a d d r e s s e d b y t h e Co u r t . Al t h o u g h t h e Co u r t ma y h a v e ma d e a n i mp l i c i t j u d g me n t t h a t t h e d e f e n d a n t wa s n o t d r i v i n g i n v i o l a t i o n o f t h e s t a t u t e , t h e b a s i s u p o n wh i c h t h e s u mma r y j u d g me n t wa s u p h e l d wa s t h a t a n e x a mi n a t i o n o f t h e c i r c u ms t a n c e s s u r r o u n d i n g t h e a c c i d e n t s u p p o r t e d f i n d i n g p l a i n t i f f mo r e t h a n 5 0 % a t f a u l t i n t h e a c c i d e n t .

Th e o t h e r c a s e i s Wa t t s v . Wi l k e r s o n , 1 9 9 4 W 8 5 9 5 1 ( Te n n . Ap p .

L 1994) .

4 5 3 , 458 ( M Ct . App. 198 1) , quot i ng Laf f e r t y v . W t l e , 349 o. at S. W 2 d 519, 528 ( M Ct . App. 1961) . . o.

The s pe e d of t he de f e nda nt ’ s ve hi c l e i s a n i s s ue o f d i s p u t e d ma t e r i a l f a c t , a s i t be a r s on whe t he r t he s t a t ut e wa s v i o l a t e d a nd whe t he r s uc h vi ol a t i on, i f a ny, c ont r i but e d t o t h e pr oxi ma t e c a us e of t he a c c i de nt . Pr oxi ma t e c a us a t i on i s t o b e de t e r mi ne d by t he t r i e r of f a c t , unl e s s a l l r e a s ona bl e p e r s o n s woul d a gr e e on t he pr ope r out c ome . Se e M Cl e nahan v . c Co o l e y , 806 S. W 2d 767 ( Te nn. 1991) . . Ac c or di ngl y, we va c a t e s u mma r y j udgme nt on be ha l f of t he s e de f e nda nt s a nd r e ma nd f o r f u r t h e r pr oc e e di ngs c ons i s t e nt wi t h t hi s opi ni on.

Pl a i nt i f f a l s o f i l e d t hi s a c t i on a ga i ns t hi s i ns u r e r u n d e r t he uni ns ur e d a nd unde r i ns ur e d mot or ve hi c l e c ove r a ge s t a t ut e . W n t he owne r or ope r a t or of a ve hi c l e whi c h c a u s e s he b o d i l y i nj ur y or pr ope r t y da ma ge i s unknown, t he i ns ur e d c a n o n l y r e c ove r i f : ( A) Ac t ua l p hy s i c a l c ont a c t s ha l l ha ve oc c ur r e d be t we e n t he mot or ve hi c l e owne d or ope r a t e d by s u c h unknown pe r s on a nd t he pe r s on or pr ope r t y of t he i ns ur e d; or ( B) The e xi s t e nc e of s uc h unknown mot or i s t i s e s t a bl i s he d by c l e a r a nd c onvi nc i ng e vi de nc e , ot he r t ha n a ny e vi de nc e pr ovi de d by oc c upa nt s i n t he i ns ur e d ve hi c l e .

T. C. A. §56- 7- 1201( e ) ( 1) . The onl y e vi de nc e i n t he r e c or d a s t o t h e e xi s t e nc e of t he gr e y ve hi c l e c ome s f r om t he t wo o c c u p a nt s of pl a i nt i f f s ’ ve hi c l e . The c ondi t i ons r e qui r e d b y t h e s t a t ut e ha ve not be e n e s t a bl i s he d i n t hi s c a s e a nd s umma r y j u d g me nt wa s a ppr opr i a t e on t he i s s ue of uni ns ur e d mot or i s t c ov e r a ge . Car di n v . Ca mpbe l l , 920 S. W 2d 222 ( Te nn. App. .

1995) . Howe ve r , t he c l a i m a ga i ns t t he i ns ur a nc e c a r r i e r r e l a t i ng t o t he unde r i n s ur e d pr ovi s i on of pl a i nt i f f s ’ pol i c y wi l l b e r e i ns t a t e d b e c a us e t he a c t i on ha s be e n r e i ns t a t e d a s t o t h e r e ma i ni ng de f e nda nt s .

The c os t o f t h e a ppe a l i s a s s e s s e d t o de f e nda nt a nd t h e c a us e r e ma nde d.

________________________ He r s c he l P. Fr a nks , J .

CONCUR:

_ _ _ _ _ ______________________ Ho u s t o n M Godda r d, P. J . .

_ _ _ _ _ _ _____________________ Do n T. M M r a y, J . c ur

I N THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE EASTERN SECTI ON FILED June 6, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk

ANTHONY W NANCE, . ) C/ A NO. 03A01- 9701- CV- 00037 a n d BRANDON NANCE, ) ) CAM PBELL CI RCUI T Pl a i nt i f f s - Appe l l a nt s , ) ) v. ) ) CHRI STOPHER H. STRUNK, ) ) De f e nda nt - Appe l l e e . )

O R D E R

Thi s c a us e wa s r e gul a r l y he a r d a nd c ons i de r e d by t h e c our t . I T I S NOW ORDERED t ha t t he j udgme nt of t he Tr i a l Co u r t i s a f f i r me d i n p a r t , r e ve r s e d i n pa r t , a nd t he c a us e r e ma nd e d.

Th e c o s t s of a ppe a l a r e a dj udge d t o de f e nda nt , f or whi c h e xe c ut i on ma y i s s ue i f ne c e s s a r y.

PER CURI UM

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.