Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, 1997

Keith Scarbrough v. State

Keith Scarbrough v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Decided December 10, 1997

Keith Scarbrough v. State

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED MAY SESSION, 1997 December 10, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson KEITH SCARBROUGH, ) Appellate Court Clerk C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9607-CC-00322 ) Appe llant, ) ) ) CHEATHAM COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. ROBERT E. BURCH. JUDGE STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) Appellee. ) (Post Conviction - Sentencing)

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Keith Scarbrough Pro Se John Knox Walkup R.M.S .I. Attorney General and Reporter 7475Cockrill Bend-Industrial Rd. Nashville, TN 37209-1010 Peter M. Coughlan Assistant Attorney General James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243 Dan Alsobrooks District Attorney General James W. Kirby Assistant District Attorney Sycamore Street Ashland City, TN 37015

OPINION FILED ________________________ AFFIRMED PURSU ANT TO RU LE 20 JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE OPINION In this appe al of the summary dismissal of his post-conviction petition Appe llant, Keith Scarbro ugh, a sks this Cour t to revie w the va lidity of his conviction entered upon his pleas of guilty onFeburary 27, 1986. Appellant pled guilty to armed robbery, grand larceny, an d seco nd deg ree burg lary. As part of the plea a greem ent App ellant rece ived sen tences totaling11 years.

Although acknowledging his po st-convictio n petition was time-barred under the three yea r statute of limitations in effe ct whe n his co nviction beca me fin al, Appellant argues that the ena ctment on May 10, 1995, of the new one year statute of limitations for post-conviction petitions creates a new one year period in which he may file for post-conviction relief. Our State Supreme Court has only recen tly resolved this issue adversely to A ppellant’s position. Carter v. S tate, Monroe Co., No. 03-S-01-9612-CR-00117 (Tenn. S. Ct. September 8, 1997, at Knoxville). Thus the petition for post-conviction relief was properly dismissed.

According ly, the judgm ent of the trial court is affirm ed in all resp ects pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

____________________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

-2- CONCUR:

___________________________________ PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE

___________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

-3-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.