State v. Dock Battles
State v. Dock Battles
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON SEPTEM BER SESSION, 1997
DOCK BATTLES, ) FILED C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9611-CR-00423 ) September 23, 1997 Appellant, ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) SHELBY COUNTY Appellate C ourt Clerk VS. ) ) HON. JOHN P. COLTON, JR. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) JUDGE ) Appellee. ) (Habeas Corpus)
ON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY
FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: DOCK BATTLES, PRO SE JOHN KNOX W ALKUP MLRC, 6000 State Road Attorney General and Reporter Memphis, TN 38134 DEBORAH A. TULLIS Assistant Attorney General 5th Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243 JOHN W. PIEROTTI District Attorney General ALANDA HORNE Assistant District Attorney General Criminal Justice Complex, Suite 301 Poplar Street Memphis, TN 38103
OPINION FILED ________________________ AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20 DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE ORDER The Appellant appeals as of right from the trial court’s dismissal of Appellant’s petition for habeas corpus relief. The trial court determined that the petition did not allege grounds which would warrant habeas corpus relief, and dismissed the petition without appointing counsel or conducting an evidentiary hearing. W e affirm the dism issal.
The petition alleges essentially that the sentencing court erroneously sentenced the Appellant and that he has not received appropriate credit for time he served while awaiting trial. Habeas corpus relief is available only if the judgment restraining the petitioner is void or the petitioner’s sentence has expired. The allegations contained in this petition, even if true, establish neither of these grounds.
W e conclude that the evidence does not preponderate against the finding of the trial judge and that no error of law requiring a reversal of the judgment is apparent on the record. Based upon a thorough reading of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the law governing the issues presented for review, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20 of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee.
____________________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
-2- CONCUR:
___________________________________ JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE
___________________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE
-3-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.