IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON SEPTEMBER 1997 SESSION FILED September 17, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) Appellate C ourt Clerk ) NO. 02C01-9610-CR-00377 Appellee, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY VS. ) ) Hon. Bernie Weinman, Judge RANDY S. WATSON, ) ) (Habitual Motor Vehicle Offender) Appellant. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: BRETT B. STEIN JOHN KNOX WALKUP N. Main Street Attorney General and Reporter Number 3102 Memphis, TN 38103 KENNETH W. RUCKER Assistant Attorney General Criminal Justice Division James Robertson Parkway Nashville, TN 37243-0493 WILLIAM L. GIBBONS District Attorney General REGINALD HENDERSON Assistant District Attorney General Poplar Avenue, Suite 301 Memphis, TN 38103

OPINION FILED:

AFFIRMED

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE OPINION

Appellant contends the Habitual Motor Vehicle Offender Act (HMVO Act) violates double jeopardy principles. On May 9, 1996, appellant was declared an Habitual Motor Vehicle Offender (HMVO) based upon appropriate prior convictions.

His motion to dismiss based upon double jeopardy was denied.

We AFFIRM the order of the trial court.

DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND THE HMVO ACT

State v. Conley, 639 S.W.2d 435, 437 (Tenn. 1982), found the double jeopardy defense to be unavailable to the HMVO declaration since the revocation of driving privileges is remedial and not punitive in nature. This reasoning has been followed in recent months by this Court in State v. Spears, C.C.A. No. 02C01-9606- CR-00197 (Tenn. Crim. App. filed July 10, 1997, at Jackson), and State v. Rowlett, C.C.A. No. 01C01-9605-CC-00211 (Tenn. Crim. App. filed August 22, 1997, at Nashville). Upon review of the record before us, we find nothing to cause us to hold differently.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE CONCUR:

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE