Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1998

Bennie Day and Karen Day v. City of Dercherd, Otis B. Smith, Jr., Mayor, Hank...

Bennie Day and Karen Day v. City of Dercherd, Otis B. Smith, Jr., Mayor, Hank...
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Decided July 10, 1998 · Special Judge Walter R. Bussart

Bennie Day and Karen Day v. City of Dercherd, Otis B. Smith, Jr., Mayor, Hank...

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E A T N A S H V IL L E FL E I D B E N N IE D A Y a n d K A R E N D A Y , ) J u ly 1 , 1 9 9 8 ) C e c il W . C r o w s o n P e titio n e rs /A p p e lla n ts , ) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k ) A p p e al N o . v . ) 0 1 -A -0 1 -9 7 0 8 -C h -0 0 4 4 2 ) C IT Y O F D E C H E R D , O T IS B . ) F r a n k li n C h a n c e ry S M IT H , J R ., M A Y O R , ) N o . 1 4 ,3 8 1 H A N K W E D D IN G T O N , B IL L V A N ) H O O S IE R , F R A N K G R E E N , a n d ) D A R Y L D O N E Y , C O M M IS S IO N E R S ) ) R e s p o n d e n t s /A p p e l le e s . ) C O N C U R R IN G O P IN IO N I c o n c u r in th e re s u lt o f t h e m a j o r i t y o p in io n b u t w o u ld b a s e th a t r e s u lt o n d iff e re n t re a s o n in g .

I n M c C a lle n v . C ity o f M e m p h is , 7 8 6 S .W .2 d 6 3 3 (1 9 9 0 ) th e S u p re m e C o u r t a b a n d o n e d t h e d if f e re n t s t a n d a r d s o f r e v ie w b e tw e e n c o m m o n la w c e rtio ra ri a n d d e c la ra to ry ju d g m e n t a n d h e ld : W h e th e r t h e a c ti o n b y th e l o c a l g o v e r n m e n t a l b o d y is le g is l a ti v e o r ad m in is tra tiv e in n a tu re , th e C o u rt s h o u ld re fr a in fr o m s u b s titu tin g its ju d g m e n t fo r th e b r o a d d is c re tio n a r y a u th o rity o f th e lo c a l g o v e rn m e n ta l b o d y . A n in v a lid a tio n o f th e a c tio n s h o u ld ta k e p la c e o n l y w h e n th e d e c is i o n is c le a r l y il l e g a l , a rb it r a ry , o r c a p r i c io u s .

T h e r e f o r e , t h i s a c t io n ( i n a c t io n ) b y th e C ity o f D e c h e r d C o m m is s io n e r s s h o u l d b e re v ie w e d a c c o r d in g to th a t s t a n d a r d . M y r e v ie w o f th is r e c o r d d o e s n o t le a d to th e c o n c lu s io n th a t th e d e c is io n is " c le a rly ille g a l, a rb itra ry o r c a p r ic i o u s ." T h e r e f o r e , t h e C h a n c e r y C o u r t d e c r e e s h o u l d b e a f f i r m e d .

F u r t h e r , I a m m o v e d to c o m m e n t o n t h e p a r a g r a p h re g a r d i n g l e g is l a to r s .

M a n y f o r c e s a f f e c t t h e l e g i s la t i v e p r o c e s s a t a n y l e v e l ; s o m e g o o d , s o m e n o t.

T h e ju d i c ia ry s h o u ld n e v e r b e u s u r p le g is l a ti v e fu n c ti o n ; b u t w e s h o u ld b e a v a i la b l e a s a c h e c k o n l e g i s la tiv e a c t io n s w h i c h a r e u n c o n s titu t io n a l o r o u ts id e le g is la tiv e p ro v in c e . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ W A L T E R W . B U S S A R T , S P E C IA L J U D G E

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.